Friday, March 15, 2024 36 games
Today: winner picks 18 of 27 right · total picks 19 of 35 right. Pick: who we think wins (Banker very likely, Solid likely). Line: the bookmaker's handicap. FLA -9.5 means Florida must win by 10 or more to cover. Prediction: our expected winning margin. Line pick: shown only where history shows an edge. Underdogs getting 12 to 17.5 points covered 53% of the time over the last 7 seasons; other lines are close to a coin flip, so no pick. Result: what happened against the line. Total pick: UNDER at neutral-site games (went under 51.8% over 7 seasons), OVER when the spread is 20+ (went over 52.3%). These are small edges, below the ~52.4% normally needed to profit. Model total: our computer's projected combined points (from each team's speed and points per possession) and its over/under call against the O/U line. Tested on 37,000 past games it was right about 50.4% of the time. Not betting advice.
| Time / Status | Away | Home | Pick | Line | Prediction | Line pick | Result | O/U | Total pick | Model total | Prev. meetings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | 62 | vs |
67 | PUR Solid 75% ✓ | PUR -7.5 | PUR won by 5 · not covered | 142.5 | UNDER 142.5 · 51.8% (129) ✓ | 40 met · PUR 19 · MSU 21 | ||||
| Final | 65 | vs |
63 | SHSU Solid 66% ✗ | SHSU -4.5 | SHSU lost by 2 · not covered | 134.5 | UNDER 134.5 · 51.8% (128) ✓ | 5 met · SHSU 2 · UTEP 3 | ||||
| Final | 73 | vs |
56 | TENN Solid 81% ✗ | TENN -9.5 | TENN lost by 17 · not covered | 141.5 | UNDER 141.5 · 51.8% (129) ✓ | 30 met · TENN 22 · MSST 8 | ||||
| Final | 59 | vs |
81 | USF Solid 75% ✓ | USF -7.5 | USF won by 22 · covered | 135.5 | UNDER 135.5 · 51.8% (140) ✗ | 27 met · USF 15 · ECU 12 | ||||
| Final | 70 | vs |
61 | WIS Solid 66% ✓ | WIS -4.5 | WIS won by 9 · covered | 135.5 | UNDER 135.5 · 51.8% (131) ✓ | 36 met · NU 9 · WIS 27 | ||||
| Final | 53 | vs |
65 | GRAM Solid 62% ✓ | GRAM -3.5 | GRAM won by 12 · covered | 129.5 | UNDER 129.5 · 51.8% (118) ✓ | 8 met · GRAM 6 · BCU 2 | ||||
| Final | 54 | vs |
85 | WKU Solid 69% ✓ | WKU -5.5 | WKU won by 31 · covered | 150.5 | UNDER 150.5 · 51.8% (139) ✓ | 42 met · WKU 21 · MTSU 21 | ||||
| Final | 60 | vs |
72 | UAB Solid 66% ✓ | UAB -4.5 | UAB won by 12 · covered | 146.5 | UNDER 146.5 · 51.8% (132) ✓ | 3 met · UAB 0 · WICH 3 | ||||
| Final | 55 | vs |
86 | AUB Solid 75% ✓ | AUB -7.5 | AUB won by 31 · covered | 144.5 | UNDER 144.5 · 51.8% (141) ✓ | 27 met · AUB 17 · SC 10 | ||||
| Final | 73 | vs |
60 | KENT -1.5 | KENT won by 13 · covered | 135.5 | UNDER 135.5 · 51.8% (133) ✓ | 44 met · BGSU 15 · KENT 29 | |||||
| Final | 90 | @ |
95 | CONN Solid 81% ✓ | CONN -9.5 | CONN won by 5 · not covered | 148.5 | 20 met · CONN 15 · SJU 5 | |||||
| Final | 80 | vs |
74 | NORF Solid 62% ✗ | NORF -3.5 | NORF lost by 6 · not covered | 138.5 | UNDER 138.5 · 51.8% (154) ✗ | 42 met · NORF 33 · HOW 9 | ||||
| Final | 62 | vs |
60 | QUIN -2.5 | QUIN lost by 2 · not covered | 137.5 | UNDER 137.5 · 51.8% (122) ✓ | 23 met · QUIN 9 · SPU 14 | |||||
| Final | 74 | vs |
77 | ILL Solid 69% ✓ | ILL -5.5 | ILL won by 3 · not covered | 150.5 | UNDER 150.5 · 51.8% (151) ✗ | 38 met · ILL 15 · OSU 23 | ||||
| Final | 65 | vs |
72 | UNC Solid 75% ✓ | UNC -7.5 | UNC won by 7 · not covered | 147.5 | UNDER 147.5 · 51.8% (137) ✓ | 16 met · UNC 9 · PITT 7 | ||||
| Final | 59 | vs |
82 | HOU Solid 83% ✓ | HOU -10.5 | HOU won by 23 · covered | 132.5 | UNDER 132.5 · 51.8% (141) ✗ | 5 met · HOU 3 · TTU 2 | ||||
| Final | 97 | vs |
87 | UK Solid 69% ✗ | UK -5.5 | UK lost by 10 · not covered | 159.5 | UNDER 159.5 · 51.8% (184) ✗ | 15 met · UK 11 · TA&M 4 | ||||
| Final | 71 | vs |
77 | FAU Solid 69% ✓ | FAU -5.5 | FAU won by 6 · covered | 136.5 | UNDER 136.5 · 51.8% (148) ✗ | 24 met · FAU 10 · UNT 14 | ||||
| Final | 62 | vs |
65 | AKR -2.5 | AKR won by 3 · covered | 139.5 | UNDER 139.5 · 51.8% (127) ✓ | 49 met · AKR 29 · OHIO 20 | |||||
| Final | 67 | vs |
59 | ARIZ Solid 85% ✗ | ARIZ -11.5 | ARIZ lost by 8 · not covered | 155.5 | UNDER 155.5 · 51.8% (126) ✓ | 43 met · ARIZ 24 · ORE 19 | ||||
| Final | 71 | vs |
58 | NCCU Solid 69% ✗ | NCCU -5.5 | NCCU lost by 13 · not covered | 138.5 | UNDER 138.5 · 51.8% (129) ✓ | 25 met · NCCU 19 · DSU 6 | ||||
| Final | 68 | vs |
79 | MARQ Solid 66% ✓ | MARQ -4.5 | MARQ won by 11 · covered | 138.5 | UNDER 138.5 · 51.8% (147) ✗ | 33 met · MARQ 21 · PROV 12 | ||||
| Final | 72 | vs |
80 | GCU Solid 69% ✓ | GCU -5.5 | GCU won by 8 · covered | 138.5 | UNDER 138.5 · 51.8% (152) ✗ | 24 met · GCU 17 · SEA 7 | ||||
| Final | 83 | vs |
79 | UCI Solid 75% ✗ | UCI -7.5 | UCI lost by 4 · not covered | 149.5 | UNDER 149.5 · 51.8% (162) ✗ | 53 met · UCI 31 · LBSU 22 | ||||
| Final | 61 | vs |
65 | FAIR Solid 66% ✓ | FAIR -4.5 | FAIR won by 4 · not covered | 133.5 | UNDER 133.5 · 51.8% (126) ✓ | 46 met · FAIR 30 · MRST 16 | ||||
| Final | 66 | vs |
93 | NEB Solid 69% ✓ | NEB -5.5 | NEB won by 27 · covered | 146.5 | UNDER 146.5 · 51.8% (159) ✗ | 19 met · NEB 8 · IU 11 | ||||
| Final | 73 | vs |
65 | UVA -2.5 | UVA lost by 8 · not covered | 122.5 | UNDER 122.5 · 51.8% (138) ✗ | 34 met · UVA 21 · NCSU 13 | |||||
| Final | 62 | vs |
76 | ISU -1.5 | ISU won by 14 · covered | 134.5 | UNDER 134.5 · 51.8% (138) ✗ | 38 met · ISU 17 · BAY 21 | |||||
| Final | 102 | vs |
88 | ALA Solid 66% ✗ | ALA -4.5 | ALA lost by 14 · not covered | 174.5 | UNDER 174.5 · 51.8% (190) ✗ | 31 met · ALA 8 · FLA 23 | ||||
| Final | 65 | vs |
72 | TXSO Solid 72% ✓ | TXSO -6.5 | TXSO won by 7 · covered | 135.5 | UNDER 135.5 · 51.8% (137) ✗ | 44 met · TXSO 35 · AAMU 9 | ||||
| Final | 86 | vs |
70 | SDSU Solid 66% ✓ | SDSU -4.5 | SDSU won by 16 · covered | 137.5 | UNDER 137.5 · 51.8% (156) ✗ | 26 met · USU 7 · SDSU 19 | ||||
| Final | 58 | vs |
54 | CLT Solid 72% ✗ | CLT -6.5 | CLT lost by 4 · not covered | 133.0 | UNDER 133.0 · 51.8% (112) ✓ | 13 met · CLT 5 · TEM 8 | ||||
| Final | 58 | vs |
52 | COLO -2.5 | COLO won by 6 · covered | 140.5 | UNDER 140.5 · 51.8% (110) ✓ | 25 met · WSU 7 · COLO 18 | |||||
| Final | 87 | vs |
84 | UTA -2.5 | UTA won by 3 · covered | 145.5 | UNDER 145.5 · 51.8% (171) ✗ | 4 met · TAR 4 · UTA 0 | |||||
| Final | 65 | vs |
68 | UCD -2 | UCD won by 3 · covered | 136.5 | UNDER 136.5 · 51.8% (133) ✓ | 26 met · UCD 10 · HAW 16 | |||||
| Final | 61 | vs |
74 | UNM -2.5 | UNM won by 13 · covered | 152.5 | UNDER 152.5 · 51.8% (135) ✓ | 42 met · UNM 27 · CSU 15 |