Friday, November 22, 2024 82 games
Today: winner picks 48 of 64 right · line picks 2 of 6 right · total picks 20 of 42 right. Pick: who we think wins (Banker very likely, Solid likely). Line: the bookmaker's handicap. FLA -9.5 means Florida must win by 10 or more to cover. Prediction: our expected winning margin. Line pick: shown only where history shows an edge. Underdogs getting 12 to 17.5 points covered 53% of the time over the last 7 seasons; other lines are close to a coin flip, so no pick. Result: what happened against the line. Total pick: UNDER at neutral-site games (went under 51.8% over 7 seasons), OVER when the spread is 20+ (went over 52.3%). These are small edges, below the ~52.4% normally needed to profit. Model total: our computer's projected combined points (from each team's speed and points per possession) and its over/under call against the O/U line. Tested on 37,000 past games it was right about 50.4% of the time. Not betting advice.
| Time / Status | Away | Home | Pick | Line | Prediction | Line pick | Result | O/U | Total pick | Model total | Prev. meetings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | VTSU Randolph | 58 | @ |
107 | Never met | ||||||||
| Final | 54 | @ |
74 | FGCU Solid 72% ✓ | FGCU -6.5 | FGCU won by 20 · covered | 134.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 83 | vs |
96 | LAS -1.5 | LAS lost by 13 · not covered | 148.5 | UNDER 148.5 · 51.8% (179) ✗ | Never met | |||||
| Final | 75 | vs |
63 | FAU Solid 66% ✗ | FAU -4.5 | FAU lost by 12 · not covered | 142.5 | UNDER 142.5 · 51.8% (138) ✓ | 1 met · FAU 0 · DRKE 1 | ||||
| Final | 85 | vs |
73 | OHIO Solid 75% ✓ | OHIO -7.5 | OHIO won by 12 · covered | 149.5 | UNDER 149.5 · 51.8% (158) ✗ | 2 met · PORT 0 · OHIO 2 | ||||
| Final | 89 | vs |
81 | UAB Solid 75% ✗ | UAB -7.5 | UAB lost by 8 · not covered | 147.5 | UNDER 147.5 · 51.8% (170) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | PR-Mayaguez | 50 | vs |
93 | Never met | ||||||||
| Final | 71 | vs |
64 | ECU Banker 87% ✓ | ECU -12.5 | STET +12.5 · covers 53% ✓ | ECU won by 7 · not covered | 143.5 | UNDER 143.5 · 51.8% (135) ✓ | 2 met · STET 0 · ECU 2 | |||
| Final | 60 | vs |
58 | NE Solid 66% ✓ | NE -4.5 | NE won by 2 · not covered | 148.5 | UNDER 148.5 · 51.8% (118) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 74 | vs |
80 | MIA Solid 66% ✗ | MIA -4.5 | MIA lost by 6 · not covered | 158.5 | UNDER 158.5 · 51.8% (154) ✓ | 1 met · OKST 0 · MIA 1 | ||||
| Final | 95 | vs |
88 | USF -1.5 | USF lost by 7 · not covered | 145.5 | UNDER 145.5 · 51.8% (183) ✗ | Never met | |||||
| Final | 63 | vs |
74 | PITT Solid 75% ✓ | PITT -7.5 | PITT won by 11 · covered | 144.5 | UNDER 144.5 · 51.8% (137) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 68 | vs |
76 | MCN Solid 83% ✓ | MCN -10.5 | MCN won by 8 · not covered | 136.5 | UNDER 136.5 · 51.8% (144) ✗ | 1 met · MCN 0 · ILST 1 | ||||
| Final | 67 | vs |
42 | YSU Solid 69% ✗ | YSU -5.5 | YSU lost by 25 · not covered | 134.5 | UNDER 134.5 · 51.8% (109) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 67 | vs |
73 | JMU -2.5 | JMU lost by 6 · not covered | 142.5 | UNDER 142.5 · 51.8% (140) ✓ | Never met | |||||
| Final | 60 | vs |
64 | KC Solid 62% ✗ | KC -3.5 | KC lost by 4 · not covered | 133.5 | UNDER 133.5 · 51.8% (124) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 70 | vs |
86 | WIS Solid 66% ✓ | WIS -4.5 | WIS won by 16 · covered | 148.5 | UNDER 148.5 · 51.8% (156) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 69 | vs |
78 | FSU Solid 66% ✓ | FSU -4.5 | FSU won by 9 · covered | 148.5 | UNDER 148.5 · 51.8% (147) ✓ | 1 met · FSU 0 · TEM 1 | ||||
| Final | Trinity Co Jax | 68 | @ |
110 | FAMU Banker 95% ✓ | 1 met · FAMU 1 · TCJ 0 | |||||||
| Final | 57 | vs |
71 | CCU -2.5 | CCU won by 14 · covered | 132.5 | UNDER 132.5 · 51.8% (128) ✓ | Never met | |||||
| Final | 73 | vs |
81 | WOF -2.5 | WOF won by 8 · covered | 141.5 | UNDER 141.5 · 51.8% (154) ✗ | Never met | |||||
| Final | 60 | vs |
76 | VAN Solid 69% ✓ | VAN -5.5 | VAN won by 16 · covered | 134.5 | UNDER 134.5 · 51.8% (136) ✗ | 1 met · VAN 0 · HALL 1 | ||||
| Final | 77 | vs |
74 | BRAD Solid 72% ✓ | BRAD -6.5 | BRAD won by 3 · not covered | 146.5 | UNDER 146.5 · 51.8% (151) ✗ | 2 met · WRST 0 · BRAD 2 | ||||
| Final | 69 | vs |
89 | LIB Solid 85% ✓ | LIB -11.5 | LIB won by 20 · covered | 133.5 | UNDER 133.5 · 51.8% (158) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 53 | @ |
84 | UTAH Banker 98% ✓ | UTAH -25.5 | UTAH won by 31 · covered | 154.5 | OVER 154.5 · 52.3% (137) ✗ | 1 met · UTAH 1 · UTU 0 | ||||
| Final | 60 | @ |
104 | OSU Banker 98% ✓ | OSU -24.5 | OSU won by 44 · covered | 142.5 | OVER 142.5 · 52.3% (164) ✓ | 1 met · OSU 1 · CAM 0 | ||||
| Final | 72 | @ |
79 | AKR Solid 81% ✓ | AKR -9.5 | AKR won by 7 · not covered | 148.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 53 | vs |
65 | UTM Solid 62% ✗ | UTM -3.5 | UTM lost by 12 · not covered | 144.5 | UNDER 144.5 · 51.8% (118) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 67 | @ |
72 | SFA Solid 69% ✓ | SFA -5.5 | SFA won by 5 · not covered | 133.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 82 | vs |
80 | TOL Solid 66% ✓ | TOL -4.5 | TOL won by 2 · not covered | 153.5 | UNDER 153.5 · 51.8% (162) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 61 | @ |
76 | LOU Banker 97% ✓ | LOU -20.5 | LOU won by 15 · not covered | 160.5 | OVER 160.5 · 52.3% (137) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 39 | @ |
78 | BTLR Banker 87% ✓ | BTLR -12.5 | MRMK +12.5 · covers 53% ✗ | BTLR won by 39 · covered | 135.5 | Never met | ||||
| Final | 68 | @ |
93 | FLA Banker 96% ✓ | FLA -19.5 | FLA won by 25 · covered | 158.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 59 | @ |
108 | UK Banker 98% ✓ | UK -35.5 | UK won by 49 · covered | 157.5 | OVER 157.5 · 52.3% (167) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 73 | @ |
71 | FOR Solid 72% ✗ | FOR -6.5 | FOR lost by 2 · not covered | 136.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 76 | @ |
87 | ETSU Solid 85% ✓ | ETSU -11.5 | ETSU won by 11 · not covered | 152.5 | 15 met · ETSU 9 · UPST 6 | |||||
| Final | 73 | @ |
82 | BUF Solid 62% ✓ | BUF -3.5 | BUF won by 9 · covered | 156.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 61 | @ |
97 | INST Banker 94% ✓ | INST -17.5 | CHST +17.5 · covers 53% ✗ | INST won by 36 · covered | 155.5 | 1 met · INST 1 · CHST 0 | ||||
| Final | 67 | @ |
78 | HARV -1.5 | HARV won by 11 · covered | 141.5 | 9 met · HARV 8 · COLG 1 | ||||||
| Final | 66 | @ |
93 | DAV Banker 96% ✓ | DAV -19.5 | DAV won by 27 · covered | 146.5 | 5 met · DAV 3 · VMI 2 | |||||
| Final | 79 | @ |
80 | ARMY -1.5 | ARMY lost by 1 · not covered | 138.5 | 1 met · MAN 1 · ARMY 0 | ||||||
| Final | 79 | @ |
93 | GAST Solid 66% ✓ | GAST -4.5 | GAST won by 14 · covered | 142.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 61 | @ |
84 | NCSU Banker 92% ✓ | NCSU -15.5 | W&M +15.5 · covers 53% ✗ | NCSU won by 23 · covered | 165.5 | 3 met · NCSU 2 · W&M 1 | ||||
| Final | 55 | vs |
80 | SJU Solid 83% ✓ | SJU -10.5 | SJU won by 25 · covered | 127.5 | UNDER 127.5 · 51.8% (135) ✗ | 3 met · SJU 1 · UVA 2 | ||||
| Final | 74 | vs |
79 | TTU Solid 85% ✓ | TTU -11.5 | TTU won by 5 · not covered | 151.5 | UNDER 151.5 · 51.8% (153) ✗ | 1 met · TTU 0 · SYR 1 | ||||
| Final | 56 | @ |
91 | MIZ Banker 97% ✓ | MIZ -20.5 | MIZ won by 35 · covered | 150.5 | OVER 150.5 · 52.3% (147) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 84 | @ |
77 | ND Banker 92% ✗ | ND -15.5 | ELON +15.5 · covers 53% ✓ | ND lost by 7 · not covered | 142.5 | 1 met · ND 1 · ELON 0 | ||||
| Final | 72 | vs |
64 | UNCA Solid 78% ✓ | UNCA -8.5 | UNCA won by 8 · not covered | 147.5 | UNDER 147.5 · 51.8% (136) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 93 | @ |
87 | TULN Banker 95% ✗ | TULN -18.5 | TULN lost by 6 · not covered | 148.5 | 14 met · TULN 5 · NOLA 9 | |||||
| Final | 65 | @ |
63 | NWST Solid 62% ✗ | NWST -3.5 | NWST lost by 2 · not covered | 136.5 | 19 met · NWST 9 · ULM 10 | |||||
| Final | 61 | vs |
64 | NEV -1.5 | NEV won by 3 · covered | 139.5 | UNDER 139.5 · 51.8% (125) ✓ | 2 met · NEV 1 · VCU 1 | |||||
| Final | 83 | vs |
80 | PRIN Solid 72% ✗ | PRIN -6.5 | PRIN lost by 3 · not covered | 138.5 | UNDER 138.5 · 51.8% (163) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 44 | @ |
80 | HOU Banker 98% ✓ | HOU -28.5 | HOU won by 36 · covered | 132.5 | OVER 132.5 · 52.3% (124) ✗ | 1 met · HOU 1 · HOF 0 | ||||
| Final | 71 | vs |
83 | KSU Solid 78% ✓ | KSU -8.5 | KSU won by 12 · covered | 149.5 | UNDER 149.5 · 51.8% (154) ✗ | 4 met · KSU 4 · GW 0 | ||||
| Final | 77 | vs |
69 | IOWA Solid 62% ✗ | IOWA -3.5 | IOWA lost by 8 · not covered | 168.5 | UNDER 168.5 · 51.8% (146) ✓ | 2 met · IOWA 1 · USU 1 | ||||
| Final | 50 | @ |
68 | NU Banker 95% ✓ | NU -18.5 | NU won by 18 · not covered | 137.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 74 | @ |
63 | CREI Solid 81% ✗ | CREI -9.5 | CREI lost by 11 · not covered | 151.5 | 23 met · CREI 17 · NEB 6 | |||||
| Final | 74 | @ |
91 | MILW Solid 66% ✓ | MILW -4.5 | MILW won by 17 · covered | 162.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 61 | @ |
58 | RICE Solid 85% ✓ | RICE -11.5 | RICE won by 3 · not covered | 135.5 | 13 met · HCU 3 · RICE 10 | |||||
| Final | 74 | @ |
75 | NAU Solid 66% ✓ | NAU -4.5 | NAU won by 1 · not covered | 142.5 | 1 met · NAU 1 · UIW 0 | |||||
| Final | 82 | @ |
70 | SCST -1.5 | SCST won by 12 · covered | 147.5 | 1 met · AAMU 0 · SCST 1 | ||||||
| Final | 81 | @ |
98 | GB -1.5 | GB lost by 17 · not covered | 151.5 | 3 met · EVAN 2 · GB 1 | ||||||
| Final | Lane College | 60 | @ |
103 | Never met | ||||||||
| Final | 77 | @ |
75 | MUR Solid 72% ✗ | MUR -6.5 | MUR lost by 2 · not covered | 143.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 83 | @ |
92 | SDAK -2.5 | SDAK lost by 9 · not covered | 152.5 | Never met | ||||||
| Final | 84 | @ |
79 | MSST -1.5 | MSST won by 5 · covered | 158.5 | Never met | ||||||
| Final | 61 | @ |
64 | WYO Solid 83% ✓ | WYO -10.5 | WYO won by 3 · not covered | 141.5 | 1 met · WYO 0 · SELA 1 | |||||
| Final | 67 | vs |
85 | ALST -1.5 | ALST won by 18 · covered | 143.5 | UNDER 143.5 · 51.8% (152) ✗ | Never met | |||||
| Final | 93 | @ |
87 | UCI Solid 72% ✓ | UCI -6.5 | UCI won by 6 · not covered | 138.5 | 2 met · WEB 2 · UCI 0 | |||||
| Final | 77 | @ |
75 | CSU Solid 85% ✗ | CSU -11.5 | CSU lost by 2 · not covered | 143.5 | Never met | |||||
| Final | 73 | @ |
91 | GCU Banker 95% ✓ | GCU -18.5 | GCU won by 18 · not covered | 145.5 | 1 met · GCU 1 · NORF 0 | |||||
| Final | 67 | @ |
79 | ARK Banker 97% ✓ | ARK -20.5 | ARK won by 12 · not covered | 144.5 | OVER 144.5 · 52.3% (146) ✓ | 1 met · ARK 1 · LR 0 | ||||
| Final | 77 | vs |
62 | TENN Solid 66% ✓ | TENN -4.5 | TENN won by 15 · covered | 142.5 | UNDER 142.5 · 51.8% (139) ✓ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 67 | vs |
58 | TEX Solid 75% ✓ | TEX -7.5 | TEX won by 9 · covered | 148.5 | UNDER 148.5 · 51.8% (125) ✓ | 1 met · JOES 0 · TEX 1 | ||||
| Final | 47 | @ |
80 | UCLA Banker 98% ✓ | UCLA -26.5 | UCLA won by 33 · covered | 134.5 | OVER 134.5 · 52.3% (127) ✗ | 4 met · UCLA 2 · CSUF 2 | ||||
| Final | 60 | @ |
77 | WASH Banker 98% ✓ | WASH -26.5 | WASH won by 17 · not covered | 142.5 | OVER 142.5 · 52.3% (137) ✗ | Never met | ||||
| Final | 77 | @ |
73 | LMU Solid 83% ✗ | LMU -10.5 | LMU lost by 4 · not covered | 147.5 | 1 met · LMU 1 · UND 0 | |||||
| Final | 72 | @ |
67 | SUU -1.5 | SUU won by 5 · covered | 150.5 | 2 met · USD 2 · SUU 0 | ||||||
| Final | Northwest U | 52 | @ |
80 | SEA Banker 95% ✓ | 7 met · SEA 7 · NWWA 0 | |||||||
| Final | 69 | @ |
55 | ARIZ -1.5 | ARIZ lost by 14 · not covered | 162.5 | 3 met · ARIZ 3 · DUKE 0 | ||||||
| Final | 88 | vs |
63 | WICH Solid 62% ✓ | WICH -3.5 | WICH won by 25 · covered | 154.5 | UNDER 154.5 · 51.8% (151) ✓ | 5 met · SLU 0 · WICH 5 | ||||
| Final | 87 | @ |
69 | UNC Banker 92% ✓ | UNC -15.5 | HAW +15.5 · covers 53% ✗ | UNC won by 18 · covered | 152.5 | 1 met · HAW 0 · UNC 1 |